The demolition of hanoks at Kahoi-dong 31-93 and 31-94

March 2010, updated June 2011, and March 2012

Bookmark and Share  

한국어 번역 - 클릭

Map showing Kahoi-dong 31-93 and 31-94
Map showing Kahoi-dong 31-93 and 31-94 (pink shading in lower left corner).
Kahoi-dong 93 & 94 in October 2006 Kahoi-dong 31-93 in October 2006
Kahoi-dong 31-93 & 31-94, (looking South)
17 August 2010
Kahoi-dong 31-93 & 31-94, (looking North)
17 August 2010
Kahoi-dong 31-93 and 31-94 on March 24th 2010

Kahoi-dong 31-93 and 31-94 on March 24th 2010

Kahoi-dong 31-93 and 31-94 on May 29th 2010
Kahoi-dong 31-93 and 31-94 on May 29th 2010
Kahoi-dong 31-93 & 31-94, 17 August 2010 Kahoi-dong 31-93 & 31-94, 17 August 2010

Kahoi-dong 31-93 & 31-94, (looking North)
17 August 2010

Kahoi-dong 31-93 & 31-94, (looking South)
17 August 2010
Gahoe-dong 31-93 and 31-94 Gahoe-dong 31-93 and 31-94
Gahoe-dong 31-93 and 31-94 Gahoe-dong 31-93 and 31-94
21 August 2011 - a new 3? 4? storey building 21 August 2011 - a new 3? 4? storey building
March 2012
March 2012

Photographs by David Kilburn ©, 2006, 2010, 2011, 2012

March 2012 - Although the new building has now been completed for a few months, there is no sign of any activity or occupation. Local comments suggest it has been designed as a commercial building to house a designer and retailer of traditional Korean dress who will also have a "museum" there. What is more certain is the simple fact that where there were three family-occupied hanoks, there is now one empty building.

 

I wrote to Oh Se-Hoon, Mayor of Seoul, about these demolitions on August 14th 2010

Dear Mayor Oh,

At the end of last year, you were widely quoted in the media as saying that you vowed to preserve Seoul's remaining old hanoks. I wonder what practical steps you are taking to do this? My question is prompted by the recent demolition of the hanoks at Gahoe-dong 31-93 and 31-94. I wonder why this happened and who approved the demolitions? I have lived in Gahoe-dong 31-79 since 1988. In recent years, I have witnessed the demolition of neighbouring hanoks at Gahoe-dong 31-96, 31-95, 31-34, 31-37, 31-38 and others, all with the apparent approval of city authorities. Is is not time for this destruction to end? Every demolition makes achieving your goal a little more difficult.

Yours sincerely

David Kilburn

 

When there was no reply, we hand-delivered a copy of the letter to City Hall and obtained a receipt for it. This time a reply soon followed. The reply stated that the demolition was perfectly legal. (PDF, HTML)

민원접수번호: 66271 p1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

민원접수번호: 66271 p2

 

http://www.kahoidong.com
Contact us

Valid HTML 4.01 Transitional